To counter another man who has unsheathed God's word to an increasingly godless culture, some pastors have started a website titled "Dobson doesn't speak for us." Charming. If you'd like to go there, Google it.
Here's the rub: if Dr. Dobson does speak for God regarding particular issues, then these pastors defiantly stand opposed to God. Let's buy Enron. Let's vote for McGovern or Dole. Let's play for the Kansas City Royals. But don't get on the team opposed to God.
So who does speak for God?
I do.
The audacity! The arrogance! Typical pig-headed, closed-minded, soda-straw-visioned Christian. Yep, that's me.
But understand, this is my identity and for any who are reading this and know Jesus Christ as Savior, this is your identity, too.
- We are called ambassadors (2 Corinthians 5:20). The purpose of an abmassador? To represent his Leader in word and deed.
- When on trial, God will speak through the believer (Mark 13:11).
- We are to proclaim the praises of what He did in and through us (1 Peter 2:9).
- The Gospel will bring conviction (Matthew 24:14).
- We are to witness what we see and what we know (John 15:27, Acts 1:8).
- Our presence (the presence of the Holy Spirit within us) becomes the stench of death to the unsaved (2 Corinthians 2:15-16).
When do I speak for God? When I proclaim His word truly. As Christians, we must know God's word for the time has come when many do not endure sound doctrine, and they heap up for themselves teachers to tickle their ears; they turn from truth and turn toward fables (2 Timothy 4:3-4). The Christian must know the truth so he is not deceived.
Peter declared, "But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them, and bring on themselves swift destruction" (2 Peter 2:1). They are here. They are among us.
How do we know when the Christian is speaking for God? Like the Bereans in Acts 17 we compare the speaker's words with God's words. If we find consistency, winner! If not, as is the case with Senator Obama's voting record, we must expose the biblical inconsistency.
This will make you no friends. Good luck finding any with a liberal slant willing to discuss the issues from a biblical perspective. The platforms are untenable. This ought not dissuade us from applying God's word to the issues of the world and to pray that blindness will cease.
So now and with boldness the Christian must speak the truth of God's word in and to a people that is perishing.
Christians, speak on! And expect the spears to fly.
*I have found little to disagree with regarding the doctrine and teaching of Jerry Falwell. While I appreciate his outspokenness on moral issues, Pat Robertson tends to be far less careful with his biblical scholarship.
4 comments:
Amen. To all of the above.
-JP
I don't personally have a liberal slant; that said, I think it's awfully presumptuous to assume that those who do are unable or unwilling to approach/discuss issues from a solid biblical perspective...
Presumptuous? It was a statement based upon experience. Are they unwilling? Peace, food, health all sound like good things, but how God's word says we ought to handle such things differs from most folks who lean left politically.
From experience, the Bible tends to get hedged by the liberal leaning Christian and the issue made of greater importance. While the issue must be addressed, it must not be done so at any cost and especially not contrary to God's word.
It's probably an indictment upon most conservatives who call themselves Christian that they, too, are unable to discuss the world around them from a biblical perspective (despite having a firm foundation upon which they could stand).
I suppose what I'm saying is that it's not far-fetched that people can disagree about issues (SOME issues..."non-essential" issues), and both be approaching it biblically. You see it across church denominations. Sure, we attend the church that we do because we find it holds most truly to Scripture as we understand it. (Too bad comments don't have italics for those last few words.) I'm NOT saying the Bible can be "interpreted" willy-nilly however people feel it will suit them best. BUT there are legitimate disagreements (over things like baptism, particulars on communion, etc.) We don't claim that all those who disagree on THOSE points are approaching them unbiblically... I have had discussions (recently, even) with some who are swaying slightly to the left on SOME issues. I don't agree with the conclusions they've come to (much like I don't agree with some other Christians' perspective on baptism), BUT I can see where they are coming from and why...and I respect their walks and relationships with the Lord VERY much.
Of course, there are some political issues that have clear moral and biblical delineations. Not all issues are that way. And after 8 years with a conservative Christian president in the White House (and no disrespect is intended here at all), we STILL have abortion, gay marriage (more common now than before), and other major problems running rampant.
One president can only do so much. It IS an important decision, and one worth weighing heavily. Christians (well, people on BOTH sides, really) should be careful not to slander those with any opposition carelessly. I'm not sure if this applies to you or not, but it's something I've observed (among conservative Christians more frequently, though perhaps just because I run in those circles). Firmness in one's beliefs does not require unkindness to conflicting ones. To put it another way, trying to prove your opposition wrong doesn't validate what you're saying. The right thing can stand alone, purely because it's RIGHT. (...and not necessarily because it's right-WING.)
Post a Comment