Showing posts with label Social Programs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Programs. Show all posts

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Miserable cities

Forbes Magazine puts out a list upon which no city wants to find its name. How would you like to be living in one of "America's Most Miserable Cities?" You may have thought it was the color you painted your house. No, the problem goes deeper than that.

The things examined by Forbes to come up with this inglorious list include "the serious" and "the less weighty." Things like unemployment and inflation, violent crime, foreclosures, taxes, and home prices appear alongside quality of life downers like weather and commute times.

Below I have listed Forbes' top 20. As you examine the list, notice which states show up again and again. Consider what these places have in common.

1. Detroit, Michigan. Home prices tanking. Violent crime through the roof
2. Flint, Michigan. People are leaving the city faster than sponsors are leaving Lance Armstrong.
3. Rockford, Illinois. Illinois. Need I say more?
4. Chicago, Illinois. Another feather in the cap of Rahm Immanuel.
5. Modesto, California. Third highest unemployment in the U.S.
6. Vallejo, California. Hmmm...Michigan, Illinois, California...hmmm...
7. Warren, Michigan. We have Michigan by a nose.
8. Stockton, California. Largest city to file for bankruptcy in 2012. Top 5 in crime and unemployment.
9. Lake County, Illinois. Okay, this started out kind of funny. It's turning tragic.
10. New York, New York. You knew this had to break the top 10.

There's the top 10. Have you noticed the similarities? On with the show.

11. Toledo, Ohio. Another state heard from. Apologies to Cpl. Klinger.
12. St. Louis, Missouri. I'm not surprised. I've been to their bus depot. Sounds like mis-er-y.
13. Camden, New Jersey. 42% of residents living below the poverty line. How can that be?
14. Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Interesting choice. Forbes didn't like their winters nor their property tax.
15. Atlantic City, New Jersey. I guess casinos aren't the solution to the world's ills.
16. Atlanta, Georgia. Breaking out of the mold. Housing collapse and heinous traffic.
17. Cleveland, Ohio. Forbes said, "Only Flint and Detroit have a faster exodus rate."
18. Poughkeepsie, New York. Cutest name in the top 20. Lousy weather and commute.
19. Gary, Indiana. Sandwiched amidst Illinois, Ohio, and Michigan, what did you expect. Kentuckians are thankful for the Ohio River!
20. Youngstown, Ohio. Nothing left to say.

Three from Michigan. Three from Ohio. Three from Illinois. Three from California. Two each from New York and New Jersey. These are places steeped in government and social law. There are other common factors, too (union thuggery, broken families, and out-of-wedlock births), that I'll not address here.

So how's the state as savior working out for them?

If big government is crushing cities on the local level, what makes us think big government will cure all ills on the national level? Freedom constrained breeds blight and sucks the life from the organism.

The nanny state is unsustainable. We must jettison it soon by choice and pick up the heavy and productive yoke of personal responsibility. If we do not, it will come crashing down all around us, and great will be the fall.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

"Gay" marriage questions

So, when the definition of marriage is eradicated and homosexuals can "marry" with the endorsement of the government:
1.  Will it become illegal for a pastor to proclaim what the Bible states about the act, that it is sin (like adultery, beastiality, incest)?
2.  Will Christian organizations (and for that matter, Muslim organizations) be permitted to not hire those who do not hold to orthodoxy?
3.  What about non-sectarian businesses?  I really can't imagine this anymore, but if a corporation or mom-and-pop joint felt that such conduct stood contrary to their corporate image, would they be free to not hire those they felt to be morally "suspect?"
4.  Many counter that this will not open Pandora's Box to other and alternative marriages (why can't Bob marry his puppy?), but can someone explain to me that if marriage is no longer between a man and a woman (the parts seem to fit, btw), why it can't be between men (plural) and women (plural) or men and trees or men and men and women? And what's so wrong with incest? Or children?  Please don't recoil at such a question.  Many never imagined the homosexual marriage thing would be embraced with such favor or fervor.
Our nation saw fit to reward those who chose to marry (man and woman) in days of yore for very specific reasons.  Little did they foresee the ramifications that so innocuous a governmental endorsement would have upon our nation.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Madison's meltdown revisited

I posted a lament Saturday over what's happening in Wisconsin's capitol here. Just a few more thoughts if I might.

1.  Self-destruction. Perhaps the single saddest part of this whole nightmare is the inability of the selfish to see that they are burning the house down around them. It's from such folks we get the term "cutting off your nose to spite your face." In this case, they seem bent on cutting off their entire head.  
2. Friends. An old proverb suggests that you can tell the quality of a man by noting the quality of his friends. If you knew nothing about what's happening in Madison, you could pick your side just by knowing that Jesse Jackson and Nancy Pelosi yoked up on behalf of the strikers. An aside: I'm always amazed and disgusted at the things that bring Jesse Jackson out from under his rock.
3. Cowardice. Nobody likes the boy who takes his ball and goes home because he does not get his way. "Weenie" comes to mind. Back in 2003, Texas' democrats left the state rather than vote on redistricting. "If we cannot get our way, we'll take the vote away. Damn the constitutional process!" Wisconsin democrats borrowed from that same playbook. In hopes to thwart Governor Scott Walker's plan to balance his state's budget, they beat feet. (The Texans had to go to Oklahoma. Let's hope the Cheeseheads had the good sense to go to Minnesota over Illinois.)
Much like the teachers leaving their post, I would consider my congressman AWOL. While I don't advocate their being shot as would happen in the old school military, there must be some recompense for deserting your duty. You might not like the outcome, but that's your job as an elected REPRESENTATIVE! You vote. You work within your constitutional boundaries. You don't like it? Resign!
By the way, if you're giggling about what's happening under Madison's rotunda, you obviously haven't been peeking in on your government lately.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Cheddarheads aflame

Ah, unions.

I will concede that there was a time when unions did great things for American workers, but from where I sit, I don't recall a good thing that American unions have done during my adult life. I'm willing to have my position corrected if you'd like to share. I'll listen. Really

But you'll then have to explain Madison.

The beautiful facade of Madison, Wisconsin
I've spent a lot of time in Madison, Wisconsin. During my many visits I've read the Capitol Times and Wisconsin State Journal with raised eyebrows wondering how the general populace could stomach newspapers with a bigger slant than an Augusta National green.

I understood the leftist history of the U-Dub--"Berkley Central" if you will. When things get going on State Street, though, Badgerland makes Berkley look down right Limbaughesque.

Two weeks ago they hoisted the Super Bowl trophy. Now Wisconsin looks like Cairo. What's happening up nort' is the same thing that happened to Ford and Chevy, the same thing that's been happening to the airlines, the same thing that's happening to California, Illinois, New York, and New Jersey. The money going out is a whole lot less than the money coming in.

I'm no Alan Greenspan, I'm not anywhere close to Adam Smith or F.A. Hayek, but I do know how to balance a checkbook. One of the most important things I learned in college and during premarriage counseling was that money-out could not exceed money-in. It's true for individuals and couples.  It's true for Wal-Mart and Wyoming.  It's true for the Mets and it's true for Mozambique. So why should Madison, Chevy, and the United States be exempt from such principles?

Wisconsin's in the hole. Over the next two years, what they are budgeting to spend based upon what they hope to bring in equates to a $3.6 billion with a "B" shortfall. That's a lot to overdraw your account. In small companies, that means belt-tightening. Pay cuts for all my friends. In fact, some of my friends might be on the street. Laid off. Looking for work.

One of the biggest fund-sucks to any government/corporation any more is retirement and medical. Here are the "draconian" measures suggested by Governor Scott Walker:

  • Government employees would now have to pay half of their pension costs.  They currently pay zero.
  • They are also being asked to pay 12.6% of their health-care costs, up from 6%.
  • And, oh yes, collective bargaining would be done away with.
While keeping all of those things would be nice, it would also be nice if Muslims and Jews held hands around a Coke bottle swaying back and forth while they harmonized on "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing." Not gonna happen. When unions lock their feet into their unreasonable demands while their company sinks around them, it would be like the arrogant Titanic passenger demanding a medium-rare filet mignon because the center was just not pink enough while icy water lapped at his ankles. Dude, you are so without a clue.

Unions have driven most American auto manufacturers to the point of collapse. "It's the MAN's fault! He's bringing us down. There's more money. We can get more. We deserve more." And they are always so polite and courteous in their presentations.

The bailouts should never have happened. Let the ship sink into the inky and frigid abyss and take the sick-outs with it, those who would abandon the kids in the schools and torpedo their own boat.

Considering the gajillion dollar debt the nation has racked up, think of Madison as a microcosm of things to come for our nation. The answer is NOT more taxes. We, rich, poor, and middle income alike, cannot afford it. The answer is cutting our spending and paying our debts.  Guess what, boys and girls? That might mean that some of us will be looking for work. That might mean me.

That would be a far better place than to be than residing alongside Davy Jones' locker.

Friday, November 6, 2009

Homeless Dave

The company that owned the three-story building that became our church forsook it for a mere $25,000.  It snuggles in a rundown section of our city a half-dozen blocks from the local mission to the homeless.  For years, boards covered the windows in its upper stories.  It comes as no surprise then when a homeless man or woman veers into our building as we gather for worship on Sunday mornings or evenings or Wednesday nights.

Dave first walked in during a Wednesday night a year and a half ago.  Appearance and odor announced his position on society's ladder.  Do you indict me for my superficiality?  You would be right to do so.  God indicts me.  "My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory...but if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors"  (James 2:1, 9).

I've learned this lesson before.  One morning eighteen years ago, as I served as an elder in my church in Utah, I noticed out the window a couple walking up the walk to our door.  "Oh, my," though I.  He stood a towering six foot four with hair that would have made Gene Simmons proud and and topped with a Berkley beret.  She perked along beside him on pink stilettos, a Barbie-doll wife coifed with tumbling gold locks and bedecked with size-4 clothes that matched her petite frame.  Immediately God skewered my heart for my godless assessment of exteriors.  I met them at the door and welcomed them to our fellowship.  The giant, Robyn, and his bride, Dena, became some of our closest friends during our time along the Wasatch Front.


Back to Dave.  Arriving after our service had commenced, he took a seat near the back of the room where he fidgeted about and never seemed to focus on the pastor's points.  On Wednesday nights, we have a small break between our formal service and when we reconvene to pray about issues affecting us.  During that break Dave expressed a need for a few dollars to get something to eat and to purchase a bus pass so that he could start looking for work.  The pastor, not wanting to abet a drug or alcohol habit, asked to keep his wallet while Dave went and got his food and his pass and then returned, and our pastor told him he would be happy to take him wherever he needed to go after the service if he would be willing to stay during our time of prayer.  Dave said he needed to be on his way and left.

To this day, the pastor still has his wallet.

Two other times, though, over the past eighteen months, Dave came back to our church.  He reran his story like a Disneyland automaton.  One time I offered to take him to get his pass or some food and he became angry that I wouldn't trust him by just giving him money.  He left.

Two Wednedays ago, Dave returned again.  He walked into Wednesday night's service, sat down for five minutes, restless the entire time, and left.  He didn't even wait for the break or to talk to anyone.

The following Monday I was by myself down at the church sweeping out a room we were renovating.  I had the door open to the street, enjoying the cool breeze of the fall day.  In walked Dave, and out came the same tattered story.  He asked if he could help me for the nine dollars he needed for the bus pass to get to his job at Whataburger.  While the story remained a ruse, his willingness to labor instead of just shilling for a few dollars encouraged my soul.  I enlisted his help.

When it came time to pay him and not wanting him to squander his keep on alcohol or drugs, I offered to take him to get the bus pass.  "I see where this is going," he huffed.  Realizing I would not pay him unless I could take him, he relented and got into my car.  As we drove to where bus passes are sold, he again became frustrated that I wouldn't just give him the money and asked to be dropped off near some apartments.  Dave did not want a bus pass.  Nor did he want food; he told me he had food at home.  Here I wanted to help a man who wanted no help.

What did Dave want, I do not know, but as I got the few dollars out of my wallet that he had earned, he crystalized in my mind a distinction among America's homeless, a distinction our PC culture refuses to address.  Dave, like so many others, seeks to leech off of the productive belly of America.  Dave has no desire to find a real job with 9-to-5 responsibilities.  He feeds at the mission and mooches a few dollars more here and there for -- what?  Porn?  Drugs?  Maddog?  Weed? 

We used to call such folks vagrants and vagabonds, tramps and hobos.  Such a lifestyle was seen as a blight to a town, and such parasites were driven out of town.  News exposes have shown that many of the guys on street corners are running a business, a business taking your money.  Today we embrace these folks as "homeless."  We pretend they have no choice.  We flagellate ourselves and lament, "Our society has done this to these poor souls!"  What a sham.  Let us call bums "bums."

Before you stone me as a granited-hearted Scrooge, I do understand that there are folks who have tragically lost everything they have and that passionately want to work hard to again become part of the commonwealth of man.  I do believe there are folks who long to be part of a family but through mental deficiency or physical malady have been cast off.  We, individually (not through government mandate), have a responsibility to those who have suffered loss or have been ostracized.  They can be productive members of society or vital members of a family. 

But those are not the folks of which I speak.  Dave and his ilk have no desire for either.  Paul commanded the church at Thessalonica, a church dealing with vagrancy, "If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat."   When we give such leeches free bread, we foster their vagabondage, we abet their sloth.

My heart aches for Dave.  What makes him different from me?  Why do I choose to labor and he to panhandle?  Regardless, he has a choice, and he has chosen his path just as I have a choice each day to trod the path I have chosen.  For me to encourage him in his lifestyle would be as sinful as looking down my nose in prejudice for his filthy clothing or foul smell.  I must deal with my prejudicial sin before a holy God (and it is a stench in His nostrils), but I cannot condone Dave's sin as I repent my own.

As he got out of my car, I asked Dave not to come back to our church unless he wanted our help to become a productive part of our city or unless he wanted to get his life straigtened out before God.  If he wanted to travel a new path, there would be a dozen families willing to come along side and help him to that end.  I would like to hope I would be near the front of the line.

Until then, there would be no more bus passes for Dave.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

QotD: General silliness

Colin Powell is not a conservative. Never was. Perhaps a teeny bit in the military realm. A very teeny bit. Certainly not in international politics. Definitely not in his domestic politics. Catch this up-chucking quote from a former military icon:
"Americans do want to pay taxes for services. Americans want more government in their lives, not less."
What's most troubling is that I believe he is right, but this is only so because I don't believe most people think too well anymore. With a non-stop frenzied assault upon our senses through every possible media imaginable, we are stinker thinkers. Honestly, how many people have spent more time than it takes a single song to conclude in our iPod headphones to think about a single issue? I indict myself with my words.

Thinking birthed America's Revolution, the Federalist papers, and the finest constitutional government the world has ever seen. Thinking brought about the Civil War. Men considered what the Constitution meant regarding states' rights and man's rights. Thinking birthed the Reformation and the Great Awakening as men considered the truth of God's word in light of the world around them.

We don't think much. Is my tummy sated? Who can satisfy my sexual itch? Do I have enough money to party this weekend or maybe get to South Padre during spring break? Is anything getting in my way that might impede me from getting and doing what I want?

That said, is it any wonder folks want the government doing things for them? If they thought through the horrors of letting the government root itself deeper in their personal lives, such a comment from so distinguished a gentleman would serve to dismiss him forever from public life as mindless radical who's not thought through effects of so terrible a cause.

Read Mark Steyn's take on General Powell's comments and the pending doom of conservatism in America here.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Satan's counterfeit: The 23rd Psalm

The government is my shepherd:
I need not work.
It alloweth me to lie down on a good job;
It leadeth me beside still factories;
It destroyeth my initiative.
It leadeth me in a path of a parasite for politic’s sake;
Yea though I walk through the valley of laziness and deficit-spending,
I will fear no evil, for the government is with me.
It prepareth an economic Utopia for me, by appropriating the earnings of my own grandchildren.
It filleth my head with false security;
My inefficiency runneth over.
Surely the government should care for me all the days of my life,
And I shall dwell in a fool’s paradise forever.


Author unknown

Wish I'd have written it!

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

QotD: Lazy fare

    "The trouble with the social-democratic state is that, when government does too much, nobody else does much of anything."


Mark Steyn from "America Alone"

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Socialized medicine: Oh, Canada

Here's why we don't want the government involved in our medical care:
"Emergency rooms in Canada are so crowded that patients are dying while they wait to be treated, Canadian doctors said (last month). Treatment is free in Canada's national health care system, and at many hospitals packed ambulances idle outside for hours because there is no place to leave patients. . . . 'We've had people have heart attacks in the waiting room, people seize in the waiting room, and patients have miscarriages in the waiting room,' said Dr. Brian Rowe of the University of Alberta Hospital. 'It's like a Third World country.'"
And we want this? Am I missing something?

Excerpted from The Week from within Ross MacKenzie's column