Monday, June 9, 2008

QotD: Canadian-style

Mark Steyn immigrated here from Canada. He is a polished journalist whose book, America Alone, ranks as one of my top reads in the last five years. In his recent column for National Review, he comments on Barack Obama's speech as the presumptive nominee of the democratic party.
Speaking personally, I don’t want to remake America. I’m an immigrant and one reason I came here is because most of the rest of the western world remade itself along the lines Sen. Obama has in mind. This is pretty much the end of the line for me. If he remakes America, there’s nowhere for me to go — although presumably once he’s lowered sea levels around the planet there should be a few new atolls popping up here and there.
Explaining a joke kills a joke, but if you didn't track with his comment about lowering the sea-levels, hunt down Obama's speech somewhere. It's a hoot. He continues a little later on:
Nothing in Obama’s resume suggests he’s the man to remake America and heal the planet. Only this week, another of his pals bit the dust, convicted by a Chicago jury of 16 counts of this and that. “This isn’t the Tony Rezko I knew,” said the senator, in what’s becoming a standard formulation. Likewise, this wasn’t the Jeremiah Wright he knew. And these are guys he’s known for 20 years. Yet at the same time as he’s being stunned by the corruption and anti-Americanism of those closest to him, Obama’s convinced that just by jetting into Tehran and Pyongyang he can get to know America’s enemies and persuade them to hew to the straight and narrow. No doubt if it all goes belly up and Iran winds up nuking Tel Aviv, President Obama will put on his more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger face and announce solemnly that “this isn’t the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad I knew.”
His conclusion seals the deal, but I'll leave that for you to read if interested.

Allowance

A friend asked my wife recently about allowances for kids. Having done it for nearly fifteen years, we're pretty familiar. There are many ways to skin this cat, but here's how we've done it.

First, we didn't tie the allowance to anything. It's one of those bennies of being in a family. At the same time, they have chores to do that also come with being part of the family. They do not get paid for them. Their allowance is not tied to those chores at all. If chores aren't done, they may suffer some form of discipline, but we do not touch the allowance.

If a child does want to earn more money, then they can do additional tasks above and beyond the chores (car washing is a good one...maybe they can just do the headlights when they're young). Pay for a job well done. If it isn't well done, then teach them how to do well. If they still don't do it well, pay them accordingly. They'll get the idea.

We began the venture when each of our kids was six years old. Any younger and their money comprehension skills just aren't there.

Second, we use their allowance to teach God's principles about money.

Principle #1: It's all God's. Psalm 24:1 states plainly, "The earth is the LORD’s, and all its fullness, the world and those who dwell therein." Our kids need to know right from the beginning that our money, all of it, is God's in the first place. Ultimately, what He has given us is stewardship over that money. We are merely caretakers of that which is God's.

Principle #2: Because it is God's, the first thing we do with our allowance is to honor God with it. This principle lies within the Levitical law and the bringing of the firstfruits or the first part of the harvest to God. The first part was the best; it's not the leftovers (Malachi 1:6-14).

Paul carried out this principle with the Corinthian church when he said, "On the first day of the week let each one of you lay something aside, storing up as he may prosper, that there be no collections when I come" (1 Corinthians 16:4). Heart attitude is important, too (see 2 Corinthians 9:6-8).

Here's how we fleshed this out: We purchased a plastic recipe card box that would fit small envelops in it. We labeled three envelops "#1-Offering," "#2-Saving," and "#3-Spending." Let's say you gave your child $6. Give it to them all in $1's so they can split it up easily. Show them to put that $1 into their offering envelop to be given to God the next Sunday. It's a mindset. The first part is always God's.

Let me say at this point that the amount you give for an allowance will vary from family to family. Really, the amount for a wee little one, unless they are spoiled rotten, will not matter; they'll simply be thrilled to be entrusted with money (initially, your supervision is imperative. They will feel entrusted, but you will still have ultimate authority).

Be consistent. My paycheck was the 1st & 15th of every month so that is when they got their allowance. Make it a ritual with them and sit down and divide the money.

Principle #3: Save! This really covers two points. One is delayed gratification. It's a principle that will ultimately save tons of money in adulthood by avoiding debt and its associated costs. The other principle is regarding the preparing for future needs, or in their case, wants (Proverbs 6:6-11).

Going back to the example of a $6 allowance, we already allocated $1 as an offering to God (lots of good teaching lessons from the Bible associated with this principle). Next, save to save, you are saving money for "long-term" savings. Long-term to a child might be three months, but this is money the child won't touch.

We had our kids use this money for big purchases. Back then it was a Gameboy (first version, yellow screen). But we would not let them get it when they had enough saved for it, we had them save half again as much. In other words, if it was a $50 purchase, we had them save $75 dollars. That way, they never left themselves on "E".

As with grown-ups, this, like our offering, is really a small fraction of our budget (for that is what we are teaching our kids), so we would have them put $2 from the $6 in the "#2-Savings" envelop.

We can also teach our kids about debt avoidance herein, too.

The final $3 goes into the final envelop, "#3-Spend." This is for your child to spend on what they would like. Without your guidance, it would be gone on your next foray through Wally-World, but you can teach them to hold on to it until there is something that they would truly like. Perhaps there might be a missionary come through your church and they want to take some of their "spending" money and give it to that cause. Perhaps they want to channel it into their "savings" envelop to get them closer to their Oakley sunglasses or BMW.

Teach them to discipline themselves with their "spending"money. Sometimes, it will be a good lesson to let them squander it. Other times, you would be wise to run interference for your child and say, "No," when they want to fritter away their few coins. But your the parent. That's why you get the big bucks!

Kind of a lengthy blog, but I know there are young families with young kids just getting to this point. We started when they were six and ended at sixteen or when they get their first job whichever occured first. Also, when they hit ten, we increased their allowance a bit.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Also, if you have some advice for young parents and allowances, please comment. Lots of good books and articles from Crown Financial Ministries and others in Christian finance. I've also found good advice from Kiplinger's Personal Financial Magazine.

Oh, and we didn't use Monopoly money.

I have come to the brink of utter ruin...

...in the midst of the whole assembly.
That proverb strikes like a hammer in the middle of a father's warning to his son about what would befall the man who became enticed by the adulterous woman. She had ensnared him.
Her feet go down to death;
her steps lead straight to the grave.
verse 5
Now, most men do not adulter their wives in the physical sense, but many adulter them nonetheless through inappropriate stares, flirtations, or involvement with pornography. Men struggle with this in the midst of the whole assembly (to include yours truly). Sadly, some do not struggle at all; they simply cave like a wave-smitten sand castle.

I heard it said once that five out of six men struggle with lust and the rest lie about it. This sin besets men because a) God created us to be struck through the eyes by a woman's beauty, and b) our pride prevents us from confessing that it is an issue in our lives. As such, in the midst of those who love us most, in the midst of those who would love to shoulder our load, we come to the brink of utter ruin.

My point in blogging this is not the lust. Certainly, that is a big issue that men need to man-up to, but the bigger problem can be tagged onto any sin. That bigger problem is b) above, the thing that prevents the restoration. We do not have the power to overcome sin on our own. Notice Paul's clash of the Titans in Romans 7. Only in our abiding in Christ can He change our hearts and change our ways. Abiding in Christ does not mean flying solo. It means living in non-stop relationship to Him and in loving obedience to what He says. That means:
All of this is done in love for and for the glory of the God who has rescued us from the outhouse basement.

To struggle in futile silence while bedecked in a sardonic mask will only leave us withered and less effective men in the work to which God has called us. Aren't any of us perfect; to most, the mask is obvious anyway. They just don't know what's happening underneath.

Let's chuck the clown mask, confess our sin, and let the healing come.

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Aberrant

This morning on the Drudge Report, the e-news outlet assaulted its viewership with a profile nude picture of a young lady who has altered her anatomy. She "felt" herself to be a man and so had her breasts surgically removed and began taking testosterone. Hair began to grow on her face.

Below the waist her anatomy remained the same. Ultimately, she became pregnant. The headline on Drudge (and the headline being vaunted throughout the media)?
World's first pregnant 'man'--four weeks from birth!
I'm not including a link. It's not worth the travel. I will give kudos to Drudge, though, for at least putting man in quotations.

This is not a man! The woman was beautiful before she began to mangle her anatomy. What has happened? The song from Disney's Hunchback of Notre Dame, "Topsy-Turvy," applies here in spades.

With our society continuing to jettison its historical moral foundation, anything goes. Homosexuality? It's a constitutional right, don't you know. Polygamy? Who's to say that that style of parenting is any worse than two-parent families? Sexuality? It's fluid; just ask institutions of higher learning and US government offices that are now mandating gender and tolerance training.

The Christian who holds to "God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them" (Genesis 1:27) can anticipate greater and greater hostility from a society intolerant toward those who hold to the absolute, unchanging, inalterable word of God. To speak out against conduct contrary to God and His nature will soon invite punitive action by the state and society at large. Prison and lost jobs loom on our horizon.

In Canada, hate-crime legislation has already led to muscle being applied to the Christian community. Here is another doozy from north of the border (no, not Oklahoma) dealing with the dissolution of a Christian ministry that could not survive the storm. Europe is worse.

From an era where sexual aberration could not be found (the 50's and 60's) to today where it is the foundation upon which sitcoms and prime-time dramas are built, the tidal wave of no restrictions will bring our nation to its knees.

Saturday, June 7, 2008

Cause for pause?









Things that make you say, "Hmmmm..."
photo by Sgt. Matthew C. Cooley

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Just another day? June 5th

More tornadoes across the plain today. I know, old hat.

China's got more aftershocks. Only 5-point-something.

Then there's the big to-do in Seattle about lesbians kissing during a Mariners' game, but the to-do is over the "up tight" heteros who felt it necessary to complain to a ballpark employee. Yikes.

Then there was this little gem this afternoon. CNN's website ran this headline:

Video shows man hit by car, no one helping

The catch ran as follows. For those familiar with Francis Schaeffer's indictment of our era as one with only two values, personal peace and affluence, factor that in as you read what took place and note especially the police chief's blistering explanation:

A 78-year-old man is tossed like a rag doll by a hit-and-run driver and lies motionless on a busy city street as car after car goes by. Pedestrians gawk but do nothing. One driver stops briefly but then pulls back into traffic. The chilling scene -- captured by a surveillance camera -- prompted a police chief to lament: "We no longer have a moral compass."

I'm not surprised that I came across this declaration the day before yesterday...

You have wearied the LORD with your words;
Yet you say,

" In what way have we wearied Him?"
In that you say,

" Everyone who does evil
Is good in the sight of the LORD,
And He delights in them,"
Or, "Where is the God of justice?"

Malachi 2:17

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

E'08: And they're off!

"And so it begins."
Theoden King (actor Bernard Hill)

I think Hillary Clinton can scratch and claw all she would like to, but I believe the die has been cast. Nearly six full months before they tumble to the end of the table to see if we end up with craps.

As citizens of a free country, we get to vote come November. Many will squander that richest of privileges because they vote the surface and not the substance. To treat this privilege like the gravest of responsibilities it is, we should wisely plumb the depths of who these men are.

To that end, I will be offering up articles that I believe have objectively addressed a point regarding the two men before us.

The first article that impressed today came from the Wall Street Journal. It challenges us regarding the hard things we should be looking at within the depths of the Senator from Illinois, Barack Obama. You can read it right...about... here.


Monday, June 2, 2008

Well-honed and utilized

"Tool Time" invokes images of Tim Allen misusing and mishandling tools with hilarious abandon, and when the one craftsman in the room, Richard Karn ("Al Borland"), is asked if he wants to give it a try, he shakes his head and deadpans, "I don't think so, Tim."

On a sitcom, we laugh to see tools misused. In real life, we usually bleed.

We are the autonomous tools of God's creation. We function one of three ways. First, we can run the machine apart from the directions. You can consider this the dude that ends up in the ER or worse. In the end, these are those who have rejected God outright. They might get away with the rejection of the directions, but ultimately, their warranty will lapse. For eternity.

Second, we can follow the directions begrudgingly, always seeking ways to circumvent the directions thinking in the end that we know a better way to operate the machine. This is the one who truly knows their Savior, but when they see Him face to face, they will have the scars, not of service, but of selfishness.

Last of all, we can submit to the Master Craftsman. This is the One who made the tools and knows best how they are operated. He aches for us to let Him have His way in our lives, to wield us as He sees fit.

This lesson has been thrust in my face time and time again this past month. When that happens, I suspect it's a point I've been missing that I need to be getting. This linked article brought the lesson home in spades. Below the article within the reader's comments, notice the second comment, the one posted by "Cheryl D." That lady gets it.

I pray that I would.

Sunday, June 1, 2008

The "Wright" question

Barack Obama has caught more flak than a B-29 over Ploesti over his association with Jeremiah Wright (I can't bring myself to use the title "Reverend" with such). If that wasn't bad enough, Father Michael Pfleger of a black, liberation-theology Catholic Church continued the stream of vitriol against America and sent the Illinois senator scrambling for media cover once again.

The onslaught could not be avoided. Obama finally jettisoned his membership in the church whose doctrines you by this time know full well. It is interesting to note that he resigned the membership not because of what Wright or Pfleger preached but because he did not want to be a further distraction to the church. He doesn't denounce the church or its doctrine at all.

While that's an eye-popper worthy of a post all by its lonesome, that's not my subject. Here's what's rattled my cage these these last three months: the media and most of America have accused these orators (they're not preachers) of bigotry and treason, of hate-speech and coddling terror. The one thing they've not been accused of, at least in print, is being heretical.

You see, media opinion is not the standard. Public opinion is another poor yardstick (lemmings, anyone?). What matters is the ultimate standard, the unchanging, inspired, inerrant Word of truth, the Bible. Are these gentlemen adhering to God's word. If they are (I actually typed that with a straight face), then God is pleased. If they aren't, then God is way distressed.

In post-Christian Americana, in the land of engorged tolerance, we have no viable reason to target Wright and Pfleger other than we don't like what they're saying. If God's word is true, unchanging and unalterable, then we can say with absolute clarity that these two men are fruit loops.

That's why Obama should have shunned them...20 years ago!!

Little green men revisited

A few weeks ago I posted about the Vatican's statement that the idea of little green men did not stand contrary to the Bible. I don't know if you've given it any thought, but the headlines of the last few days bring it back to light.
  • "Life on Mars?" queried the headline on the Drudge Report in bigger font than I've ever seen.
  • "In search of life," hailed FoxNews.
  • Then there's the guy who had incontrovertible proof through a homemade video that aliens exist. I think the real alien was behind the camera.
What is the purpose of the Phoenix Mars Lander (PML), NASA's latest expedition? The headlines seem to think it's a search for Gazoo. A careful examination of the University of Arizona's goals along with NASA's objectives confirms that apart some other scientific inquiries about the Red Planet, the search is in fact for ET life.

Here we go again; so what?

I'll be right up front; the theory of biological life outside the boundaries of our earth gets tangled in some fundamental biblical principles. Here are some of the issues:
  1. Exodus 20:8-11 declares that everything within the Creation was created during those first six days. As such, if alien life did exist, God created them at that time. Were life to come about by evolution, the odds of it occurring at all in the universe are as close to zero as you can get. It would be more absurd that hitting 1,000,000 consecutive slot machines. The fact that life is present here would not diminish the statistical impossibility of it being anywhere else.
  2. Man's sin brought death and destruction into the cosmos (Romans 8:20-22). Death is not natural; it is a consequence of sin (this is why life evolving from non-life runs counter to the Bible). If alien life exists on a planet orbiting Seti Alpha 3, the decay of the creation would extend to their corner of the universe, too. They would have death imposed upon them unrighteously. Humanity was justly under condemnation for its own sin. It would have beeen unjust for God to punish Klingons who had done no wrong (Kitamer notwithstanding).
  3. God the Son, Jesus Christ, was bodily raised. Christ was never un-incarnated. It is precisely because He was fully man that He could die as substitute for all mankind. Were the Wookies to defy God's law, how would God provide for their atonement?
  4. Could what we perceive to be alien apparitions (something of which the Bible does not speak) really be spiritual apparitions (something of which the Bible does speak...at length)?
Can I know absolutely that there is no biological life outside our atmosphere? No, but it is as close to a statistical impossibility that you can get. Marry that with what the Bible says about man, death, God's justice, and Christ's atonement, I think we can dismiss the possibility of running into any Cardasian warbirds the next time we head out to Saturn.
Photo from starwars.com